aimed at [0.001].:<0.1) 6 (> <0.1) ---- The most common site of a Major Bleeding event was the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Table 6.2 shows the number of and the rate at which patients experienced GI bleeding in the Savaysa 60 mg and warfarin treatment groups. Table 6.2: Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events for NVAF Patients with CrCL 95 mL/min* * During or within 2 days of stopping study treatment a GI bleeding was defined by location as upper or lower GI b Lower GI bleeding included anorectal bleeding c GUSTO Severe or life-threatening bleeding that caused hemodynamic compromise and requires intervention Savaysa N = 5417 n (%/year) Warfarin N = 5485 n (%/year) Major Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding a 205 (1.78) 150 (1.27) Upper GI 123 (1.06) 88 (0.74) Lower GI b 85 (0.73) 64 (0.54) GUSTO c Severe GI bleeding 16 (0.14) 17 (0.14) Fatal GI bleeding 1 (> <0.1) 2 (> <0.1) The rate of anemia-related adverse events was greater with Savaysa 60 mg than with warfarin (9.6% vs. 6.8%). The comparative rates of Major Bleeding on Savaysa and warfarin were generally consistent among subgroups (see Figure 6.1 ). Bleeding rates appeared higher in both treatment arms (Savaysa and warfarin) in the following subgroups of patients: those receiving aspirin, those in the United States, those more than 75 years old and those with reduced renal function. Figure 6.1: Adjudicated Major Bleeding in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48* Study *During or within 2 days of stopping study treatment Note: The figure above presents effects in various subgroups all of which are baseline characteristics and most of which were pre-specified. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do they reflect the effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be over-interpreted. Other Adverse Reactions The most common non-bleeding adverse reactions ( 1%) for Savaysa 60 mg versus warfarin were rash (4.2% vs. 4.1%), and abnormal liver function tests (4.8% vs. 4.6%), respectively. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) was reported as a serious adverse event on treatment for Savaysa 60 mg and warfarin in 15 (0.2%) and 7 (0.1%) patients, respectively. Many of the cases in both treatment groups were confounded by the use of amiodarone, which has been associated with ILD, or by infectious pneumonia. In the overall study period, there were 5 and 0 fatal ILD cases in the Savaysa 60 mg and warfarin groups, respectively. The Hokusai VTE Study In the Hokusai VTE study, the duration of drug exposure for Savaysa was 6 months for 1561 (37.9%) of patients,> 6 months for 2557 (62.1%) of patients and 12 months for 1661 (40.3%) of patients. Bleeding was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation and occurred in 1.4% and 1.4% of patients in the Savaysa and warfarin arms, respectively. Bleeding in Patients with DVT and/or PE in the Hokusai VTE Study The primary safety endpoint was Clinically Relevant Bleeding, defined as the composite of Major and Clinically Relevant Non-Major (CRNM) Bleeding that occurred during or within three days of stopping study treatment. The incidence of Clinically Relevant Bleeding was lower in Savaysa than warfarin [HR (95% CI): 0.81 (0.71, 0.94); p =0.004]. Table 6.3 shows the number of patients experiencing bleeding events in the Hokusai VTE Study. Table 6.3: Bleeding Events in the Hokusai VTE Study Abbreviations: N=number of patients in the modified intent-to-treat population; n = number of events; CRNM = clinically relevant non-major a Primary Safety Endpoint: Clinically Relevant Bleeding (composite of Major and CRNM). b A Major Bleeding event was defined as clinically overt bleeding that met one of the following criteria: associated with a fall in hemoglobin level of 2.0 g/dL or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of packed red cells or whole blood; occurring in a critical site or organ: intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intra-articular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal; contributing to death. c CRNM bleeding was defined as overt bleeding not meeting the criteria for a Major Bleeding event but that was associated with a medical intervention, an unscheduled contact (visit or telephone call) with a physician, temporary cessation of study treatment, or associated with discomfort for the subject such as pain, or impairment of activities of daily life. Savaysa (N = 4118) Warfarin (N = 4112) Clinically Relevant Bleeding a (Major /CRNM), n (%) 349 (8.5) 423 (10.3) Major Bleeding b , n (%) 56 (1.4) 66 (1.6) Fatal bleeding 2 ( <0.1) 10 (0.2) Intracranial fatal 0 (0.0) 6 (0.1) Non-fatal critical organ bleeding 13 (0.3) 25 (0.6) Intracranial bleeding 5 (0.1) 12 (0.3) Non-fatal non-critical organ bleeding 41 (1.0) 33 (0.8) Decrease in Hb 2g/dL 40 (1.0) 33 (0.8) Transfusion of 2 units of RBC 28 (0.7) 22 (0.5) CRNM Bleeding c 298 (7.2) 368 (8.9) Any Bleed 895 (21.7) 1056 (25.6) Patients with low body weight ( 60 kg), CrCL 50 mL/min, or concomitant use of select P-gp inhibitors were randomized to receive Savaysa 30 mg or warfarin. As compared to all patients who received Savaysa or warfarin in the 60 mg cohort, all patients who received Savaysa or warfarin in the 30 mg cohort (n= 1452, 17.6% of the entire study population) were older (60.1 vs 54.9 years), more frequently female (66.5% vs 37.7%), more frequently of Asian race (46.0% vs 15.6%) and had more co-morbidities (e.g., history of bleeding, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer). Clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 58/733 (7.9%) of the Savaysa patients receiving 30 mg once daily and 92/719 (12.8%) of warfarin patients meeting the above criteria. In the Hokusai VTE study, among all patients the most common bleeding adverse reactions ( 1%) are shown in Table 6.4 . Table 6.4: Adverse Reactions Occurring in 1% of Patients Treated in Hokusai VTE a Adjudicated Any Bleeding by location for all bleeding event categories (including Major and CRNM) b Gender specific vaginal bleeding percentage is based on number of female subjects in each treatment group Savaysa 60 mg (N=4118) n (%) Warfarin (N=4122) n (%) Bleeding ADRs a Vaginal b 158 (9.0) 126 (7.1) Cutaneous soft tissue 245 (5.9) 414 (10.0) Epistaxis 195 (4.7) 237 (5.7) Gastrointestinal bleeding 171 (4.2) 150 (3.6) Lower gastrointestinal 141 (3.4) 126 (3.1) Oral/pharyngeal 138 (3.4) 162 (3.9) Macroscopic hematuria/urethral 91 (2.2) 117 (2.8) Puncture site 56 (1.4) 99 (2.4) Non-Bleeding ADRs Rash 147 (3.6) 151 (3.7) Abnormal liver function tests 322 (7.8) 322 (7.8) Anemia 72 (1.7) 55 (1.3) Drug Interactions Anticoagulants, Antiplatelets, and Thrombolytics Co-administration of anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and thrombolytics may increase the risk of bleeding. Promptly evaluate any signs or symptoms of blood loss if patients are treated concomitantly with anticoagulants, aspirin, other platelet aggregation inhibitors, and/or NSAIDs [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. Long-term concomitant treatment with Savaysa and other anticoagulants is not recommended because of increased risk of bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. Short term co-administration may be needed for patients transitioning to or from Savaysa [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.4 )]. In clinical studies with Savaysa concomitant use of aspirin (low dose 100 mg/day) or thienopyridines, and NSAIDs was permitted and resulted in increased rates of Clinically Relevant Bleeding. Carefully monitor for bleeding in patients who require chronic treatment with low dose aspirin and/or NSAIDs [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 ) and Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )]. P-gp Inducers Avoid the concomitant use of Savaysa with rifampin [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . P-gp Inhibitors Treatment of NVAF Based on clinical experience from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study, dose reduction in patients concomitantly receiving P-gp inhibitors resulted in edoxaban blood levels that were lower than in patients who were given the full dose. Consequently, no dose reduction is recommended for concomitant P-gp inhibitor use [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1 ), Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 ) and Clinical Studies ( 14.1 )] . Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism [see Clinical Studies ( 14.2 )] USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Pregnancy Risk Summary Available data about Savaysa use in pregnant women are insufficient to determine whether there are drug-associated risks for adverse developmental outcomes. In animal developmental studies, no adverse developmental effects were seen when edoxaban was administered orally to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis at up to 16-times and 8-times, respectively, the human exposure, when based on body surface area and AUC, respectively (see Data ). The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. Clinical Considerations Disease-associated maternal and/or embryo/fetal risk Pregnancy confers an increased risk of thromboembolism that is higher for women with underlying thromboembolic disease and certain high-risk pregnancy conditions. Published data describe that women with a previous history of venous thrombosis are at high risk for recurrence during pregnancy. Fetal/Neonatal adverse reactions Use of anticoagulants, including edoxaban, may increase the risk of bleeding in the fetus and neonate. Monitor neonates for bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. Labor or delivery All patients receiving anticoagulants, including pregnant women, are at risk for bleeding. Savaysa use during labor or delivery in women who are receiving neuraxial anesthesia may result in epidural or spinal hematomas. Consider use of a shorter acting anticoagulant as delivery approaches [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. Data Animal Data Embryo-fetal development studies were conducted in pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis. In rats, no malformation was seen when edoxaban was administered orally at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day, or 49 times the human dose of 60 mg/day normalized to body surface area. Increased post-implantation loss occurred at 300 mg/kg/day, but this effect may be secondary to the maternal vaginal hemorrhage seen at this dose. In rabbits, no malformation was seen at doses up to 600 mg/kg/day (49 times the human exposure at a dose of 60 mg/day when based on AUC). Embryo-fetal toxicities occurred at maternally toxic doses, and included absent or small fetal gallbladder at 600 mg/kg/day, and increased post-implantation loss, increased spontaneous abortion, and decreased live fetuses and fetal weight at doses equal to or greater than 200 mg/kg/day, which is equal to or greater than 20 times the human exposure. In a rat pre- and post-natal developmental study, edoxaban was administered orally during the period of organogenesis and through lactation day 20 at doses up to 30 mg/kg/day, which is up to 3 times the human exposure when based on AUC. Vaginal bleeding in pregnant rats and delayed avoidance response (a learning test) in female offspring were seen at 30 mg/kg/day. Lactation Risk Summary There are no data on the presence of edoxaban in human milk, or its effects on the breastfeeding infant or on milk production. Edoxaban was present in rat milk. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, including hemorrhage, advise patients that breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment with Savaysa. Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. Geriatric Use Of the total patients in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study, 5182 (74%) were 65 years and older, while 2838 (41%) were 75 years and older. In Hokusai VTE, 1334 (32%) patients were 65 years and older, while 560 (14%) patients were 75 years and older. In clinical trials the efficacy and safety of Savaysa in elderly (65 years or older) and younger patients were similar [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1 ), Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 ), and Clinical Studies ( 14 )]. Renal Impairment Renal clearance accounts for approximately 50% of the total clearance of edoxaban. Consequently, edoxaban blood levels are increased in patients with poor renal function compared to those with higher renal function. Reduce Savaysa dose to 30 mg once daily in patients with CrCL 15-50 mL/min. There are limited clinical data with Savaysa in patients with CrCL> <15 mL/min; Savaysa is therefore not recommended in these patients. Hemodialysis does not significantly contribute to Savaysa clearance [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1 , 2.2 ) and Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . As renal function improves and edoxaban blood levels decrease, the risk for ischemic stroke increases in patients with NVAF [see Indications and Usage ( 1.1 ), Dosage and Administration ( 2.1 ), and Clinical Studies ( 14.1 )] . Hepatic Impairment The use of Savaysa in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B and C) is not recommended as these patients may have intrinsic coagulation abnormalities. No dose reduction is required in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A) [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . Low Body Weight Consideration for Patients treated for DVT and/or PE Based on the clinical experience from the Hokusai VTE study, reduce Savaysa dose to 30 mg in patients with body weight less than or equal to 60 kg [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.2 ) and Clinical Studies ( 14.2 )] . Overdosage A specific reversal agent for edoxaban is not available. Overdose of Savaysa increases the risk of bleeding. The following are not expected to reverse the anticoagulant effects of edoxaban: protamine sulfate, vitamin K, and tranexamic acid [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )] . Hemodialysis does not significantly contribute to edoxaban clearance [see Pharmacokinetics ( 12.3 )] . Savaysa Description Edoxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is supplied as edoxaban tosylate monohydrate. The chemical name is N -(5-Chloropyridin-2-yl)- N -[(1 S ,2 R ,4 S )-4-( N,N -dimethylcarbamoyl)-2-(5-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro[1,3]thiazolo[5,4- c ]pyridine-2-carboxamido)cyclohexyl] oxamide mono (4-methylbenzenesulfonate) monohydrate. Edoxaban tosylate monohydrate has the empirical formula C 24 H 30 ClN 7 O 4 S C 7 H 8 O 3 S H 2 O representing a molecular weight of 738.27. The chemical structure of edoxaban tosylate monohydrate is: It is a white to pale yellowish-white crystalline powder. The solubility of edoxaban tosylate (pKa 6.7) decreases with increasing pH. It is slightly soluble in water, pH 3 to 5 buffer, very slightly soluble at pH 6 to 7; and practically insoluble at pH 8 to 9. Savaysa is available for oral administration as a 60 mg, 30 mg, or 15 mg round shaped, film-coated tablet, debossed with product identification markings. Each 60 mg tablet contains 80.82 mg edoxaban tosylate monohydrate equivalent to 60 mg of edoxaban. Each 30 mg tablet contains 40.41 mg edoxaban tosylate monohydrate equivalent to 30 mg of edoxaban. Each 15 mg tablet contains 20.20 mg edoxaban tosylate monohydrate equivalent to 15 mg of edoxaban. The inactive ingredients are: mannitol, pregelatinized starch, crospovidone, hydroxypropyl cellulose, magnesium stearate, talc, and carnauba wax. The color coatings contain hypromellose, titanium dioxide, talc, polyethylene glycol 8000, iron oxide yellow (60 mg tablets and 15 mg tablets), and iron oxide red (30 mg tablets and 15 mg tablets). Savaysa - Clinical Pharmacology Mechanism of Action Edoxaban is a selective inhibitor of FXa. It does not require antithrombin III for antithrombotic activity. Edoxaban inhibits free FXa, and prothrombinase activity and inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Inhibition of FXa in the coagulation cascade reduces thrombin generation and reduces thrombus formation. Pharmacodynamics As a result of FXa inhibition, edoxaban prolongs clotting time tests such as prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Changes observed in PT, INR, and aPTT at the expected therapeutic dose, however, are small, subject to a high degree of variability and not useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of edoxaban. Following oral administration, peak pharmacodynamic effects are observed within 1-2 hours, which correspond with peak edoxaban concentrations (C max ). Cardiac Electrophysiology In a thorough QT study in healthy men and women aged 19-45 years, no QTc interval prolongation was observed with edoxaban (90 mg and 180 mg). Effect of PCCs on Pharmacodynamics of Savaysa There is no systematic evaluation of bleeding reversal by 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) products in patients who have received Savaysa. Effects of PCC (50 IU/kg) on the pharmacodynamics of edoxaban were studied in healthy subjects following a punch biopsy. Following administration of a single dose of edoxaban, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) returned to pre-edoxaban baseline levels in 0.5 hours after the initiation of a 15 minute infusion of 50 IU/kg PCC, compared to more than 24 hours with placebo. Mean ETP levels continued to increase and exceeded pre-edoxaban baseline, reaching maximum elevations (~40% over pre-edoxaban levels) at 22 hours after initiating PCC dose, which was the last observation of ETP. The clinical relevance of this ETP increase is unknown. Pharmacodynamic Interactions Aspirin Co-administration of aspirin (100 mg or 325 mg) and edoxaban increased bleeding time relative to that seen with either drug alone. NSAID (Naproxen) Co-administration of naproxen (500 mg) and edoxaban increased bleeding time relative to that seen with either drug alone. Pharmacokinetics Edoxaban displays approximately dose-proportional pharmacokinetics for doses of 15 to 150 mg and 60 to 120 mg following single and repeat doses, respectively, in healthy subjects. Absorption Following oral administration, peak plasma edoxaban concentrations are observed within 1-2 hours. Absolute bioavailability is 62%. Food does not affect total systemic exposure to edoxaban. Savaysa was administered with or without food in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai VTE trials. Administration of a crushed 60 mg tablet, either mixed into applesauce or suspended in water and given through a nasogastric tube, showed similar exposure compared to administration of an intact tablet. Distribution Disposition is biphasic. The steady-state volume of distribution (Vd ss ) is 107 (19.9) L [mean (SD)]. In vitro plasma protein binding is approximately 55%. There is no clinically relevant accumulation of edoxaban (accumulation ratio 1.14) with once daily dosing. Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3 days. Metabolism Unchanged edoxaban is the predominant form in plasma. There is minimal metabolism via hydrolysis (mediated by carboxylesterase 1), conjugation, and oxidation by CYP3A4. The predominant metabolite M-4, formed by hydrolysis, is human-specific and active and reaches less than 10% of the exposure of the parent compound in healthy subjects. Exposure to the other metabolites is less than 5% of exposure to edoxaban. Elimination Edoxaban is eliminated primarily as unchanged drug in the urine. Renal clearance (11 L/hour) accounts for approximately 50% of the total clearance of edoxaban (22 L/hour). Metabolism and biliary/intestinal excretion account for the remaining clearance. The terminal elimination half-life of edoxaban following oral administration is 10 to 14 hours. Specific Populations Hepatic Impairment In a dedicated pharmacokinetic study, patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or Child-Pugh B) exhibited similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to their matched healthy control group. There is no clinical experience with edoxaban in patients with severe hepatic impairment [see Use in Specific Populations ( 8.7 )] . Renal Impairment In a dedicated pharmacokinetic study, total systemic exposure to edoxaban for subjects with CrCL> 50 to < 80 mL/min, CrCL 30 to 50 mL/min, CrCL < 30 mL/min, or undergoing peritoneal dialysis, were increased by 32%, 74%, 72%, and 93%, respectively, relative to subjects with CrCL 80 mL/min [see Use in Specific Populations ( 8.6 )] . Hemodialysis A 4-hour hemodialysis session reduced total edoxaban exposure by less than 7%. Age In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, after taking renal function and body weight into account, age had no additional clinically significant effect on edoxaban pharmacokinetics. Weight In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, total exposure in patients with median low body weight (55 kg) was increased by 13% as compared with patients with median high body weight (84 kg). Gender In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, after accounting for body weight, gender had no additional clinically significant effect on edoxaban pharmacokinetics. Race In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, edoxaban exposures in Asian patients and non-Asian patients were similar. Drug Interactions In vitro Drug Interactions Studies In vitro studies indicate that edoxaban does not inhibit the major cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8/9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, or 3A4) and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP3A4 or the P-gp transporter (MDR1). In vitro data also indicate that edoxaban does not inhibit the following transporters at clinically relevant concentrations: P-gp, the organic anion transporters OAT1 or OAT3; the organic cation transporters OCT1 or OCT2; or the organic ion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 or OATP1B3. Edoxaban is a substrate of P-gp transporter. Impact of Other Drugs on Savaysa The effect of co-administered amiodarone, cyclosporine, dronedarone, erythromycin, ketoconazole, quinidine, verapamil, and rifampin on edoxaban exposure is shown in Figure 12.1 . Figure 12.1: Summary of Drug Interaction Study Results Impact of Edoxaban on Other Drugs Edoxaban increased the C max of concomitantly administered digoxin by 28%; however, the AUC was not affected. Edoxaban had no effect on the C max and AUC of quinidine. Edoxaban decreased the C max and AUC of concomitantly administered verapamil by 14% and 16%, respectively. Nonclinical Toxicology Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Edoxaban was not carcinogenic when administered daily to mice and rats by oral gavage for up to 104 weeks. The highest dose tested (500 mg/kg/day) in male and female mice was 3 and 6 times, respectively, the human exposure (AUC) at the human dose of 60 mg/day, and the highest doses tested in male (600/400 mg/kg/day) and female (200 mg/kg/day) rats were 8 and 14 times, respectively, the human exposure at the human dose of 60 mg/day. Edoxaban and its human-specific metabolite, M-4, were genotoxic in in vitro chromosomal aberration tests but were not genotoxic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames test), in in vitro human lymphocytes micronucleus test, in in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus test, in in vivo rat liver micronucleus test, and in in vivo unscheduled DNA synthesis tests. Edoxaban showed no effects on fertility and early embryonic development in rats at doses of up to 1000 mg/kg/day (162 times the human dose of 60 mg/day normalized to body surface area). Clinical Studies Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study was a multi-national, double-blind, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of two Savaysa treatment arms (60 mg and 30 mg) to warfarin (titrated to INR 2.0 to 3.0) in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with NVAF. The non-inferiority margin (degree of inferiority of Savaysa to warfarin that was to be ruled out) was set at 38%, reflecting the substantial effect of warfarin in reducing strokes. The primary analysis included both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. To enter the study, patients had to have one or more of the following additional risk factors for stroke: a prior stroke (ischemic or unknown type), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or non-CNS systemic embolism, or 2 or more of the following risk factors: age 75 years, hypertension, heart failure, or diabetes mellitus A total of 21,105 patients were randomized and followed for a median of 2.8 years and treated for a median of 2.5 years. Patients in the Savaysa treatment arms had their dose halved (60 mg halved to 30 mg or 30 mg halved to 15 mg) if one or more of the following clinical factors were present: CrCL 50 mL/min, low body weight ( 60 kg) or concomitant use of specific P-gp inhibitors (verapamil, quinidine, dronedarone). Patients on antiretroviral therapy (ritonavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, saquinavir) as well as cyclosporine were excluded from the study. Approximately 25% of patients in all treatment groups received a reduced dose at baseline, and an additional 7% were dose-reduced during the study. The most common reason for dose reduction was a CrCL 50 mL/min at randomization (19% of patients). Patients were well balanced with respect to demographic and baseline characteristics. The percentages of patients age 75 years and 80 years were approximately 40% and 17%, respectively. The majority of patients were Caucasian (81%) and male (62%). Approximately 40% of patients had not taken a Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) (i.e., never took a VKA or had not taken a VKA for more than 2 months). The mean patient body weight was 84 kg (185 lbs) and 10% of patients had a body weight of 60 kg. Concomitant diseases of patients in this study included hypertension (94%), congestive heart failure (58%), and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (28%). At baseline, approximately 30% of patients were on aspirin and approximately 2% of patients were taking a thienopyridine. Patients randomized to the warfarin arm achieved a mean TTR (time in therapeutic range, INR 2.0 to 3.0) of 65% during the course of the study. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of first stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic) or of a systemic embolic event (SEE) that occurred during treatment or within 3 days from the last dose taken. In the overall results of the study, shown in Table 14.1 , both treatment arms of Savaysa were non-inferior to warfarin for the primary efficacy endpoint of stroke or SEE. However, the 30 mg (15 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm was numerically less effective than warfarin for the primary endpoint, and was also markedly inferior in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. Based on the planned superiority analysis (ITT, which required p < 0.01 for success), statistical superiority of the 60 mg (30 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm compared to warfarin was not established in the total study population, but there was a favorable trend [HR (99% CI): 0.87 (0.71, 1.07)]. Table 14.1: Strokes and Systemic Embolic Events in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study (mITT, on Treatment a) Abbreviations: HR = Hazard Ratio versus Warfarin, CI = Confidence Interval, n = number of events, mITT = Modified Intent-to-Treat, N=number of patients in mITT population, SEE = Systemic Embolic Event, yr = year. a Includes events during treatment or within 3 days of stopping study treatment b Includes patients dose-reduced to 15 mg for the 30 mg treatment group and 30 mg for the 60 mg treatment group c The event rate (%/yr) is calculated as number of events/subject-year exposure. d 97.5% CI for primary endpoint of First Stroke or SEE. 95% CI for Ischemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism Events Savaysa 30 mg b (N=7002) n (%/yr) c Savaysa 60 mg b (N=7012) n (%/yr) c Warfarin (N=7012) n (%/yr) c Savaysa 30 mg vs. warfarin HR (CI) d p-value Savaysa 60 mg vs. warfarin HR (CI) d p-value First Stroke or SEE 253 (1.6) 182 (1.2) 232 (1.5) 1.07 (0.87, 1.31) p=0.44 0.79 (0.63, 0.99) p=0.017 Ischemic Stroke 225 (1.4) 135 (0.9) 144 (0.9) 1.54 (1.25, 1.90) 0.94 (0.75, 1.19) Hemorrhagic Stroke 18 (0.1) 39 (0.3) 75 (0.5) 0.24 (0.14, 0.39) 0.52 (0.36, 0.77) Systemic Embolism 10 ( <0.1) 8 (> <0.1) 13 (> <0.1) 0.75 (0.33, 1.72) 0.62 (0.26, 1.50) Figure 14.1 is a plot of the time from randomization to the occurrence of the first primary endpoint in all patients randomized to 60 mg Savaysa or warfarin. Figure 14.1: Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Event Rate Estimates for Primary Endpoint (first occurrence of stroke or SEE) (mITT * ) * On treatment Study Period defined as Initial Dose to Final Dose + three days The incidence rate of the primary endpoint of stroke or SEE in patients (N=1776) treated with the 30 mg reduced dose of Savaysa because of a CrCL level 50 mL/min, low body weight 60 kg, or the concomitant use of a P-gp inhibitor drug, was 1.79% per year. Patients with any of these characteristics who were randomized to receive warfarin had an incidence rate of the primary endpoint of 2.21% per year [HR (95% CI): 0.81 (0.58, 1.13)]. In all randomized patients during the overall study period, the rates of CV death with Savaysa and warfarin were 2.74% per year vs. 3.17% per year, respectively [HR (95% CI): 0.86 (0.77, 0.97)]. The results in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study for the primary efficacy endpoint for most major subgroups are displayed in Figure 14.2 . Figure 14.2: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study: Primary Efficacy Endpoint by Subgroups (ITT Analysis Set) Note: The figure above presents effects in various subgroups all of which are baseline characteristics and most of which were pre-specified. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do they reflect the effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be over-interpreted. The results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study show a strong relationship between the blood levels of edoxaban and its effectiveness in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. There was a 64% increase in the ischemic stroke rate in patients in the 30 mg treatment arm (including patients with dose reduced to 15 mg) compared to the 60 mg treatment arm (including patients with dose reduced to 30 mg). Approximately half of the Savaysa dose is eliminated by the kidney, and edoxaban blood levels are lower in patients with better renal function, averaging about 30% less in patients with CrCL of> 80 mL/min, and 40% less in patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min when compared to patients with a CrCL of > 50 to 80 mL/min. Given the clear relationship of dose and blood levels to effectiveness in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study, it could be anticipated that patients with better renal function would show a smaller effect of Savaysa compared to warfarin than would patients with mildly impaired renal function, and this was in fact observed. Table 14.2 shows the results for the study primary efficacy endpoint of first stroke or SEE as well as the effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the pre-randomization CrCL subgroups for Savaysa 60 mg (including 30 mg dose-reduced) and warfarin. There was a decreased rate of ischemic stroke with Savaysa 60 mg compared to warfarin in patients with CrCL > 50 to 80 mL/min [HR (95% CI): 0.63 (0.44, 0.89)]. In patients with CrCL > 80 to 95 mL/min the results for ischemic stroke slightly favor warfarin with a confidence interval that crosses 1.0 [HR (95% CI): 1.11 (0.58, 2.12)]. The rate of ischemic stroke was higher relative to warfarin in the patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min [HR (95% CI): 2.16 (1.17, 3.97)]. Pharmacokinetic data indicate that patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min had lower plasma edoxaban levels, along with a lower rate of bleeding relative to warfarin than patients with CrCL 95 mL/min. Consequently, Savaysa should not be used in patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1 ), Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ), Adverse Reactions ( 6.1 ), and Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . In patients with CrCL 95 mL/min, the Savaysa 60 mg (30 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm reduced the risk of stroke or SEE when compared to warfarin [HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.55, 0.84)]. In the indicated population (CrCL 95 mL/min), during the overall study period, the rates of CV death with Savaysa and warfarin were 2.95% per year vs. 3.59% per year, respectively [HR (95 sufficient
humorist Savaysa learn how to
EmoticonEmoticon